Course Objectives
Student understands the significance and basic function of Two-step optimization.
Student be able to access a system based on the concept of Quality Engineering.
Rubric
| Ideal Level of Achievement (Very Good) | Standard Level of Achievement (Good) | Unacceptable Level of Achievement (Fail) |
| Evaluation 1 | Student be able to propose an experiment of Assessment of Functionality perfomability. | Student understands the meaning of Two-step optimization. | Student not understands the meaning of Noise factor. |
| Evaluation 2 | Student be able to devise a basic function. | Student be able to calculate the S/N ratio of Dynamic characteristics. | Student not be able to calculate the S/N ratio of Static characteristics. |
| Evaluation 3 | Student be able to estimate the gain of S/N ratio under Optimum condition and normal condition. | Student be able to prepare a Graph of factorial effects. | Student not be able to plan an experiment from the level allocated on an Orthogonal array. |
Assigned Department Objectives
Teaching Method
Outline:
1. This course explores the outline of Parameter design as one of the main methods in the realm of off-line Quality Engineering.
2. This course aims to provide the students with sufficient knowledge of Two-step optimization that characterizes Parameter designs through practical exercises.
3. Students are expected to become engineers capable of analyzing and evaluating the basic function of systems by acquiring the concept of Parameter design.
Style:
Lecture and exercise by an instructor.
Notice:
Lecture and exercise by lecturer Study based on example questions on text book and through exercise.
The recognition of credit requires 60 points or more rating.
Course Plan
|
|
|
Theme |
Goals |
| 1st Semester |
| 1st Quarter |
| 1st |
Explanation of Syllabus
Background of Quality Engineering |
Explanation of Syllabus
Approach to Quality Engineering
Robust parameter design (RPD)
Two-step optimization
|
| 2nd |
Approach to Parameter Design |
S/N ratio: Meaning and calculation
|
| 3rd |
Approach to Parameter Design |
S/N ratio and Sensitivity: Meaning and calculation
|
| 4th |
Knowledge required for Parameter Design |
Control factor and Orthogonal array
|
| 5th |
Knowledge required for Parameter Design |
Noise factors and Compounded noise factors
|
| 6th |
Exercise 1 |
Product development by Nominal-is-best response
|
| 7th |
Knowledge required for Parameter Design |
Approach to Dynamic characteristics and calculation of S/N ratio
|
| 8th |
Knowledge required for Parameter Design |
Product development by Dynamic characteristics
|
| 2nd Quarter |
| 9th |
Exercise 2 |
Product development by Dynamic characteristics
|
| 10th |
Procedure for Parameter Design of Dynamic characteristics |
Preparation of auxiliary table and response graph
|
| 11th |
Procedure for Parameter Design of Dynamic characteristics |
Estimation of gain and confirmation run
|
| 12th |
Exercise 3 |
Parameter design of Dynamic characteristic
|
| 13th |
Exercise 4 |
Parameter design of Dynamic characteristics
|
| 14th |
Assessment of Functionality perfomability |
Definition of Functionality perfomability
Assessment procedure fo Functionality perfomability
|
| 15th |
Term-end Examination |
Approach to Parameter design
Calculation exercise
|
| 16th |
Review |
Answers of examination
Review of achievement
Questionnaire on course
|
Evaluation Method and Weight (%)
| Examination | Presentation | Mutual Evaluations between students | Behavior | Portfolio | Other | Total |
| Subtotal | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 100 |
| Basic Ability | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Technical Ability | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 100 |
| Interdisciplinary Ability | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |